better living through product    ·    by Adam Mathes   ·   archive   ·   follow @decommodify

Wigwam Socks

⍚ December 14, 2011
tweet

Although I’ve spent hundreds of dollars on a single pair of fine shoes — because my feet are worth it, and so are yours — I’ve never worried about socks.

Honestly, you really should overspend on feet. There isn’t much better advice than to take care of your feet.

And yet here I am writing this in disposable, thin, not particularly comfortable or nice, generic Hanes crew socks, and you’re probably reading it in worn out socks too.


Because socks are disposable. So why care? They wear out, you throw them out, get new ones. Nobody sees them. They are just transient pieces of cloth on feet.

But that’s wrong. Just because a product may not have a half-life in decades doesn’t mean it won’t impact your life.

Wigwam Socks

Start wearing socks that are well made, from quality materials, and are comforable. My recommendation is Wigwam.

“Wigwam Mills, Inc. is proud to knit its socks in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, U.S.A., just for you because we care.”

In terms of pure comfort for lounging around the house in your socks, the Wigwam Men’s King Cotton Crew Length Crew Sock is without peer.

Super soft, super thick — like walking on a cloud, if clouds were composed of cotton and knit in Wisconsin.

The downside is they may in fact be too thick for your shoes, if you’re the kind of person who leaves the house.

Thickness of Wigwam King Cotton compared to a worn out existing sock

For a well made sock with a more normal thickness, I recommend the Wigwam Super 60 Crew, much more reasonably priced in 7-packs. Still well-made from high quality materials in the USA and more likely to fit in your shoes, but without the lush thickness.

Waking up and putting on a fresh pair of thick, comfortable socks is a small luxury within your grasp.


King Cotton Crew Length Crew Sock, ~$10 on Amazon.

Wigwam Super 60 Crew, ~$15 for 7-pack.

iPad Sleeve

⍚ November 16, 2011
tweet

There is a cottage industry of iPad cases, and while I understand their appeal I have never desired one.

Either my iPad is in use, place on a table when not in use, or in a bag with me during travel. I only need it covered while in the bag.

I know, I know, you want something to protect it from when it’s dropped or use it to prop itself up on a plane’s tray table. I get it.

But I don’t. Those other cases add bulk and get in the way.

All I want is something to protect it from being scratched when I throw it in my bag. Nothing more, nothing less.

So I use a thin, simple, suede sleeve - the iPad Suede Jacket from WaterField Designs

It doesn’t photograph well, so watch this promotional video instead.

It’s thin. Very thin, very snug.

It has two little pieces on the side to hold the sleeve open as the iPad slides in. I find it quite satisfying to use, even if it may not be the most efficient form of storage.

There’s another little pull tab at the lengthwise end to aid removal from the sleeve. Again, quite satisfying.

It’s that tactile feel of suede, the bit of satisfaction in use, and small attention to detail that make this simple sleeve recommended.

Availability

A bit pricey, but it’s high quality materials and constructed in San Francisco.

$19 from WaterField Designs

The Best Rechargeable Batteries

⍚ November 7, 2011
tweet

Sanyo Eneloops are the best rechargeable batteries.

Sanyo invented the low-self-discharge NiMH battery. Unlike most rechargeable, it retains more of its power over time. There are competitors, but Sanyo still makes the best.

Vs. Regular Batteries

At ~$10 for 4AA, they’re easily twice as expensive as normal batteries, but you should use them much longer through charging and save money.

But it’s not really the money, it’s the convenience of just charging things instead of running out of batteries, running to the store to buy batteries, throwing out batteries constantly.

I’ve been using the original versions for years, and recently bought some of the improved 2011 editions. Never having to run out to buy batteries is easily worth the price.

Battery powered devices running out of power are one life’s small inconveniences that can be made much less annoying with a little bit of forethought.

More

Consumerresearch recommended

And Cool Tools

In depth electronic testing (with graphs) of Eneloop performance and discharge

Eneloop homepage

Buy Some

4 AA with charger, ~$20

8 AA, ~$20

Power pack, ~$50

A Leather Wallet that Gets Better

⍚ November 4, 2011
tweet

I don’t remember the last time I bought a wallet.

The wallet I’ve been using for over a decade is a wallet my father got as a gift and never used.

A lovely, shiny, black leather Coach wallet.

But despite the brand, it has only gotten worse over time.

Size

The problem is it’s too tall for US paper money. The height (at 4”) is wrong. So over time when money is in it a crease develops around where cash is in the wallet, where part is thicker than the rest.

I don’t think Coach makes it anymore — all the wallets on their site now have one fewer card holder per side, and at 3.75” tall probably fixes the problem.

The glossy texture over time has become less pleasing; the seams falling apart.

It’s not that it’s become unusable over time, but it doesn’t feel like a baseball glove that’s gotten worn in over time, more like a shoe wearing away over time.

It only feels like it will get worse.

Improve over time

What I wanted was something that would get better with age, so the Saddleback Leather wallet’s pitch appealed to me: http://www.saddlebackleather.com/Classic-Wallet-Bifold.html?sc=8&category=87

100 yr. warranty. If it wears out before you do, I’ll replace it for free 100% Full Grain leather No breakable parts,e.g. zippers, buttons etc. Industrial marine grade thread Pigskin lining (tougher than leather) Gets better looking every year No one will comment on how cool your wallet is … this year. In ten years for sure, but not this year. It’s nothing fancy. It doesn’t have a window for your driver’s license and it there’s no plastic spare key holder. It’s just a very solid wallet made with leather from the top of the hide called full grain (where the fibers are the most tightly woven together). It will be the longest lasting wallet you’ll ever own and least exciting… the first year.

And at under $50 it seemed reasonably priced to try.

In Use

It’s a bit thicker and stiffer than one might like, but that’s to be expected, I think.

It should thin itself over time. It’ll get worn in.

Patience is a virtue.

Cards at first were a bit harder to put in and out, though it’s become better over the first week.

The stitching and matte leather look good, the interior and exterior textures are very pleasing.

It feels like it will stand the tests of time, but we’ll find out. I’ll report on it again over the coming months as it gets used, but so far I’m positive on it.


Saddleback Classic Bifold Leather Wallet $45 at Saddleback Leather. · $50 on Amazon

Kindle 2011 Review Part 3

⍚ November 1, 2011
tweet

In Use

After extensive use on a week long trip to Hawaii, I like it.

It works on the beach and you don’t have to carry books.

The contrast and readability is acceptable, excepting the previously discussed typographical issues.

Battery life wasn’t an issue on a week long trip with hours of daily use.

The page turn buttons continued to bother me, but overall the ease and lightened load seemed worth it on vacations.

Vs. The Other Kindles

This is the wrong device to get someone who doesn’t have a computer and WiFi. If you’re getting a Kindle for a technophobe, consider one of the 3G models that requires zero setup and is fully self contained. A bit more in initial cost, but it will be configured to “just work” and be network enabled out of the box.

I don’t see much reason to get the keyboard version ($20 more) unless you find the dimensions of this one too small (remember, the screen size is the same, but the device size is much smaller) or the primary user will be buying books on the device rather than with a computer.

I have not used the unreleased Kindle Touch but I have my doubts that a touchscreen is necessarily better. I think I would rather have better dedicated page turn buttons than constantly be touching invisible targets on the screen to turn the page, but I’ll reserve judgment until I try one.

The Kindle Touch is a tad larger and heavier — ~6oz vs ~7.5oz, 6.5” x 4.5” x .34” vs. 6.8” x 4.7” x 0.40” — but not significantly, and $20 more.

The $199 - Kindle Fire - despite the name and branding - is not really in the same category of devices, and is more rightly compared to an iPad or Android tablet. The Kindle Fire will not have competitive battery life, weight, or a display easily read outdoors.

Vs. Competing Ereaders

The iPad is too heavy and impossible to read in the sun.

Nobody buys Android tablets and they aren’t really worth talking about, and again, they’re not really the same class of device.

iriver Story HD has partnered with Google to make an ugly device that has mostly been ignored. http://books.google.com/help/ebooks/ereader.html

I would never buy such a thing.

The Nook is the only serious competitor in the ereader space that has a properly integrated bookstore backing it, which is critical to the ease of use of an ereader.

Any device that expects you to purchase content, manage it on on a desktop hard drive, and sync via USB seems antiquated at this point.

The first generation Nook was a bizarre frankenstein hybrid of eink and a color touchscreen that I thought was extremely bizarre, though the latest Nook Simple Touch at $139 seems significantly better.

Conclusion

As I began the discussion of the device

The new Kindle is practically weightless, holds more books than many people read in a lifetime, runs for a month on a single charge, and frees you from housing physical manifestations of books you buy.

If that’s appealing to you, there’s never been a better, cheaper way to get an eink reader.

If you’d rather lug books around instead, I respect and admire you.

Don’t get it wet.

Kindle 2011 version, $79 on Amazon

Kindle 2011 Review Part 2

⍚ October 21, 2011
tweet

After embracing the mortality that electronic books represent, it’s easier to evaluate the latest Kindle.

The new Kindle is practically weightless, holds more books than many people read in a lifetime, runs for a month on a single charge, and frees you from housing physical manifestations of books you buy.

$79 on Amazon.com

Size and Weight

The new 2011 Kindle is small. Smaller than you might expect if you haven’t seen one in person, and significantly smaller than the previous generations.

Compared to a paperback:

The Kindle has the capacity to store about 1500 of those.

Screen

The 6” screen seems to have significantly improved in contrast compared to the second generation Kindle I own.

The “flashing” of all black during each page change of previous Kindles has been replaced with a flashing every few page turns, at the expense of slightly less sharp text, though I can’t tell the difference without looking through a macro lens. (I also have terrible vision.)

Turn The Page Again

The diminutive size of the device comes with a cost in terms of content displayed per page.

A quick non-scientific sampling of a full page of text in terms of characters per line:

  • 50 cpl (1036 characters over 21 lines)

Compared to my older Kindle 2 on the same text:

  • Kindle 2nd Generation: 50 cpl (889 characters over 18 lines)

Similar line lengths, but the new Kindle has less cruft at the top and bottom of the screens, allowing more lines per screen. In comparison to the Kindle app on an iPhone 4S:

  • 32 cpl (411 characters over 13 lines)

The line length still seems a bit short compared to most physical books, even tiny ones. Grabbing a trade paperback from my shelves for comparison showed about 60 characters a line, and about 40 lines per page.

The Elements of Typographical Style suggests 45 to 75 characters as acceptable, with a 66-character “widely regarded as ideal.”

The fewer characters per line is in part due to the way the text is typeset on the Kindle, generally yielding significant rivers of whitespace. Excellent typesetting (whether manual or automated) allows hyphenation and tightening of the space between words and letters together at times for better readability and compactness, while most electronic books and your web browser generally only spread words and letters further apart to justify the text, and don’t add hyphens. This leads to less pleasing rivers or white space, and hampers readability.

Compared to previous generation Kindles with the same size screen, there’s much better use of the space by eliminating some of the persistent indicators at the top of the screen. Pressing the menu key brings them back when necessary. This is a clear improvement.

But compared to a trade paperback (the smallest commercially sold books sold intended to be read) you’re still getting about 5/6 of the line length, and about half the lines per virtual page, so you’ll be “flipping” pages a lot more often than you would be for an analog book.

This makes the controls to flip pages even more critical.

Controls

But the page buttons are terrible and the affordances are all wrong.

I literally could not work the page flip buttons on my first attempts.

The buttons are flush with the beveled edge of the device. The angled bevel is extremely small - and much smaller than the edge of the device, which is what I assumed (incorrectly) was the part of the button one needs to push.

This is wrong.

Having realized this was wrong, I attempted to push inward on the tiny bevel to turn the page, which is also wrong.

In fact, the buttons aren’t even really buttons you push, because they hinge away from the device, so it’s actually more like you’re pulling the button away from the device - pushing “out.”

You have to, more or less, rock the edge of the device away from itself to change pages.

I have never seen or used a similar button on a device, and even after using the device it felt a bit unnatural. Compared to the buttons on the second generation Kindle, they seem more aesthetically pleasing but significantly less usable.

The directional control and four accompanying navigation buttons don’t exhibit any such problems, and navigating the menus and other systems is fairly easy, except for the noticeable delays in the refresh of pages.

The Off Switch

Why does it even have a power switch?

You don’t need to turn a real book off. You just pick it up and start reading.

Although it’s an electronic device, I’m unconvinced it’s necessary an ereader should behave differently. The long lasting battery of eink devices is because the screen is only powered on when changing the screen, not in a “steady” state.

So it actually uses power to reconfigure the screen to turn it off.

One of the possible advantages of having a power switch is that the device would stay off and not accidentally change pages when placed in a bag or pocket. But the power button - a small push button on the bottom of the device - can be triggered easily in a pouch or pocket accidentally.

A lock switch somewhere on the device might have been a better design.

Of course, the real reason you “close” your ebook (and it closes itself for you) has nothing to do with usability.

A Special Offer to Sell Yourself

At $79, the Kindle comes with “special offers” or what people who are not writing marketing copy for companies call “advertising.”

When “off” the Kindle displays an ad. There are also ads in the menus. There are no ads within the text of books (as far as I can tell.)

The cost of not having your devices “off state” sold to the highest bidder is $30.00.

If you’re not sure if this is annoying, it’s best to order the cheaper version as you can pay the $30 to remove the ads later.

If I continue to use the device, not having ads is worth $30 to me. Books are one of the few mediums left that are generally free from the noise of commerce and advertising, it seems unfortunate to sacrifice that.

Keyboard

The physical keyboard of previous Kindles is thankfully gone, replaced with a frustrating on screen keyboard that is best left unused. The slow refresh of eink, combined with the difficulty of navigating on screen keyboards with a directional pad makes more like texting on an ancient phone than typing on a computer keyboard.

This Kindle is really best as an auxiliary device for reading, where the books are chosen and purchased on a computer. When used in this way, there’s not much use for the keyboard.

Whispernet

Also removed is the free 3G wireless data connection present on previous Kindles and available on more expensive models, instead replaced with WiFi.

Other than the annoyance of typing in a WiFi password on the on screen keyboard, this doesn’t seem like a major loss, but does change the context of the device a bit.

Planning Ahead vs. Instant Vending Machine

With ever-present 3G access, the Kindle was entirely self-contained. You could go anywhere (within reason) and purchase and read books. No planning necessary!

With WiFi, before a trip you’ll have to actually load up your Kindle with what you want to read. Or find a place with WiFi, which is getting easier but is often not guaranteed or pricey.

This does make the Kindle lose a bit of the magic it originally had as a completely self-contained device where you could instantly buy and read a book anywhere, but practically may not impact most people. The real magic is buying on Amazon.com on a computer, and having books just show up on the device.

The Power Cord

The $79 Kindle comes with a USB cable to connect to a computer and charge it, but does not come with the AC adapter to charge the device by directly plugging it into an outlet.

Amazon charges $9.99 for the charger. Which is ludicrous.

(I already had one from an earlier Kindle.)

In Use

I’m taking it on a vacation next week and will post part three when I return, reviewing sustained usage, along with a comparison to other ereaders.

Embracing Mortality With Ebooks

⍚ October 20, 2011
tweet

Grasping for Immortality

As humans we seek to outlast ourselves.

Procreation allows us to pass on the information in our DNA beyond our own lives.

Beyond genetic information, language and oral traditions meant our stories could live past a single generation.

But the best method we have developed to preserve ideas over time has been to publish, in well constructed books, and distribute those books as widely as possible to institutions that exist to protect them over time — libraries.

It’s been the best chance you have that your words will live long past you.

The Mortality of The Digital

Real books don’t live forever, obviously — cheaply made materials, improper care, lost libraries and other hazards intervene.

But physical books are actual physical objects that you can own. With digital books, you sacrifice that on the altar of convenience.

Have you ever read the Kindle Terms of Service?

When you buy a book in a bookstore, you don’t have to agree to onerous terms — the laws dictating your use were fundamentally decided years ago by the government, not some recently drafted terms of service by corporate attorneys.

Copyright provides restrictions, but also guarantees you certain rights — Fair Use rights. Want to sell the book again? No problem. Rip out some pages? They’re yours! Photocopy a page? Nobody is stopping you.

Want to pass on those books to your children? You can.

Try those with an electronic book. You will fail.

The Man Behind the Curtain

When I was a child my father read to me L. Frank Baum’s Wizard of Oz books. Some of those books are from his childhood. If I have children, I’d like to read those same books to them.

Books as keepsakes are fundamentally incompatible with the digital world we are entering.

We know this is true, but we don’t fully know what it will mean, what the experience and reality will be for us.

Information vs. Its Container Object

Librarians have a formal ontology to explain what we mean by a “book.”

FRBR divides the bibliographic world into four basic concepts.

Three are abstract — work, expression, and manifestation, the fourth is concrete — item.

As readers what we hold in our hands are items — the physical reality of the platonic conceptual entities that are artistic works.

With digital books, everything becomes muddled.

The separation between abstract entities governed by intellectual property rights and physical entities governed through actual property rights disappears. We no longer own a physical item that embodies intellectual content, we have a license to manifest something ephemeral into physical reality on our screen - but only in certain contexts, on certain devices, under certain conditions.

These rules are written by publishers and technology companies rather than based on something as idealistic as

To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries

— US Constitution, http://www.house.gov/house/Constitution/Constitution.html

Article I Section 8 is the basis of all copyright law, but it was written long before media became a an industry, before the cost of copying information approached zero, long before corporate entities would take hold of the keys to our cultural artifacts’ future.

And in return for this drastic reinterpretation of what it means to own a book, we get access to typographically awful materials on low resolution screens.

Books are an amazing invention. They have lasted us for centuries, they are culturally significant objects with finely tuned notions of design and readability.

Ebooks today are digital turds.

Readability, Typography, and a Lack of Attention to Detail

If you care about the aesthetics of book design, you can spend a few minutes with a Kindle or other modern digital book and be disgusted.

Without control of these two factors you will certainly have rivers, ie, channels of whitespace running down the paragraphs since whitespace, or more accurately, word spacing, is what is used to justify the lines. Unfortunately, font size can be controlled by the user on the Kindle, so whenever you decide to change the font size, the word spacing changes, and if you don’t have a hyphenation library (which it appears Kindle doesn’t have on board yet) and you get a diluvian horrorshow:

A typographic critique of the Kindle

As books make the leap from cellulose and ink to electronic pages, some editors worry that too much is being lost in translation. Typography, layout, illustrations and carefully thought-out covers are all being reduced to a uniform, black-on-gray template that looks the same whether you’re reading Pride and Prejudice and Zombies or the Federalist Papers.

Why E-Books Look So Ugly

How can so little care be given to the presentation of text on a[n electronic] page? Do publishers care, or even realize, what is happening to the texts they lovingly commission, copy-edit, and proof-read, when they enter the electronic domain?

Typography is about reading – and so are ebooks

Kindle typography goes craptacular

Justified text without hyphenation or a reasonable line-breaking algorithm is a way of expressing to readers you don’t care about how text is presented by smashing them over the head with rivers of white space, amongst other crimes against the written word that the Kindle and other ereaders commit.

The Cost of Caring

Don’t bother complaining: that ebook with typos, low resolution figures that are impossible to see and improperly placed in the flow of text, and unconscionable line breaks may be downloadable in less than 60 seconds, but not returnable, and will probably not be corrected anytime soon.

In contrast to the careful professional design that publishers bring to many of their books, many electronic books look like they were put together by low wage labor whose native language is not that of the book they are working on, without any care for detail. (Because many are.)

After our society spent hundred of years perfecting the typography and design of the written word, publishers have taken their responsibility of the presentation of text and now regularly decide, fuck it, let’s outsource some low wage Asian contractors to convert this sloppily scanned book for the digital age.

It’s cheaper!

Do the CEOs of the big publishers care about the typography of their physical books, let alone digital ones?

(Do they even read them?)

Does Jeff Bezos lose sleep over the the inability to hyphenate the justified text on Amazon’s devices?

Does he notice this when he’s taking a bath with his Kindle?

I’m conflating the failures of publishers (poor document creation and editing) with those of software and device manufacturers (poor rendering, typographical choices and ignoring decades of typesetting algorithm development.)

But will there even be a distinction between those entities in the future?

The Most Perfect Cassette

We are reaping what we have sown with a steadily more illiterate society immersed in trivia. A book? It’s the perfect cassette. You can put it down and pick it up, start it in the middle, reread it. But you have to create sound and scene in your own mind with a book.

Harlan Ellison

Amazon cares about books as commodities to sell, and ereaders as commodities to sell even more books, not books as the most perfect cassette, or books as the holder of knowledge across time.

It’s silly to expect more from them. They’re a company that makes money, and they’re pretty good at that.

The Freedom from Things

The point is: it doesn’t matter.

Just as we slowly gave up the physicality of CD’s for the ease of MP3 downloads and the warm glow of iTunes, we will begin to move away from physical books as objects.

You don’t hear people complaining about how MP3s are of lower quality due to compression vs. compact discs, do you? (It is worse — but nobody can tell the difference on cheap headphones.)

I don’t want to keep buying wooden and steel shelves to house books made of trees and house them and heat them and preserve them for decades.

I have other things to do. I have a life to live beyond shepherding a personal collection of ephemera masquerading as timeless artifacts.

Don’t I? Don’t we all?

I’m out of bookshelves. I’m out of space.

I spent years studying library and information science, but I’m finding it harder and harder to recognize myself as someone who will be custodian of information embodied in paper objects for the rest of my life.

Facing Death

Ebooks are about facing death.

An admission of and acceptance of mortality and the impermanence of all things.

An ebook will almost certainly not outlast me.

It will not stand the test of time. When I die, my non-transferrable, revocable at any time licenses to content will die with me. There will be no estate sale full of the electronic books I collected over decades. There will only be a database entry on a faraway server, signifying nothing.

I’m trying to be OK with that.

But it’s important to remember The Cloud is not your friend.


This has been part one of a review of the 2011 Kindle.

Clamoring for A Better Clock

⍚ October 19, 2011
tweet

Previously:

Issues with my current clock, Various Clocks Discussed.

This is what I’d like in a clock.

Functionality

Auto-set

The clock should set itself by default, and never need setting except in the rarest of cases.

Relaxing Sound

Instead of a dream shattering buzzer to start the day, a more pleasing chime that slowly increases in loudness over a minute.

Soothing Large Blue LED Display

A cooler color than the harsh warning-like red so common in these devices, with a continuos (rather than discrete) setting for brightness.

Better Feedback

The current time, displayed in 12 hour + am/pm, along with a smaller secondary display of the alarm time to its left in 12 hour with am/pm. When the alarm is off, the alarm time is not displayed, and instead an indication the alarm is off.

Controls That Make Sense

Controls on the side of the device, so you can see the results of your changes on the front of the clock, rather than the back.

On the top of the device: a large snooze button covering most of the device, and a switch to turn the alarm on and off.

On the left of the device:

  • a switch between automatic and manual time setting.
  • a dial below that to adjust the time manually. One full rotation changes the clock’s time by 12 hours
  • a vertical slider to change the brightness

On the right of the device: * to the side a dial to adjust the alarm time. One rotation changes the alarm time by 12 hours

Aesthetics and Design

I have some ideas around that too, but I’m more concerned about the controls.

Critic vs Creator

Over the past year I’ve made an attempt to focus on creation rather than critique, but I think criticism is necessary for better creation.

The point is: this is on the list of things to try and make happen.

If you are interested let us know or follow us on Twitter for updates.

Clock Collection

⍚ October 18, 2011
tweet

PREVIOUSLY: I complained about my alarm clock.

Here is a sampling of clock designs recommended by readers and from the web that have interesting characteristics.

Giant LED Clock

Andre's giant LED Clock

While I don’t use an alarm clock, we do have a clock in our bedroom that I absolutely love simply because I don’t think about it much.

— Andre Torrez, http://notes.torrez.org/2011/10/clocks.html

Love the huge display.

Sony Dual Alarm Clock

Sony ICF180

it’s not beautiful, which matters, but it’s a pleasure to use which arguably matters more when you’re half-awake…

via @sudama

Sony ICFC180 AM/FM Clock Radio Amazon and more on CoolTools.

Sadly, it appears that Sony no longer makes any clock that features on screen persistent display of alarms and dials.

The ICF707 seems closest, but from the reviews and a quick look at the controls seems like it has usability problems.

ICF707

Sony ICF707, ~$37 on Amazon

Braun Travel Alarm Clock

Braun clock http://www.braun-clocks.com/clock/travel_alarm_clock

An iconic modern design, and eminently functional.

$32 on Amazon

$42 for the voice controlled variant

Zen Alarm Clock

Now and Zen

The Zen Alarm Clock’s long-resonating Tibetan bell-like chime makes waking up a beautiful experience — its progressive chimes begin your day with grace.

http://www.now-zen.com/Zen_Alarm_Clock.html

Now And Zen offers a number of clocks that focus on more natural sounds and designs.

Click Clock

Click Clock

This simple, easy-to-use alarm clock features large number displays, a backlight, snooze function, and 24-hour setting. When the alarm is set, large numbers display both the current time and the alarm time. The clock’s AM and PM indicators are visually distinct, and a lock on top prevents inadvertent changes in settings. Made of ABS plastic, glass, and steel; takes two AAA batteries (not included).

MOMA Store

Note the feedback: by making the state of the clock and alarm visible and explicit there’s much less room for error.

$55 on Amazon

Zeo Sleep Manager

Zeo Sleep Manager

Zeo is designed to help you analyze your sleep and improve it, so you can be your best every day. It’s composed of a lightweight wireless headband, a bedside display, a set of online analytical tools, and an email-based personalized coaching program.

http://www.myzeo.com/sleep/shop/featured-products/zeo-sleep-manager-bedside.html

Recommended by a friend of mine.

Menu system is easy to navigate, morning sounds are pleasing, buttons have different lines and ridges so you can change stuff in the dark… all buttons are on top and huge.

Next generation: Zeo Mobile Sleep Manager

$149 on Amazon

Philips Hf3470/60 Wake-up Light

Wake Up Light

A more natural approach to waking with a simulated sunrise.

$89 on Amazon

Bose Wave Radio II

Bose Wave Radio

The Wave® radio II is our latest version of the radio that changed people’s idea of a time-honored medium. Digital electronics and updated speaker technology allow this innovative table top radio to deliver more accurate audio with deeper lows. And its uncluttered design makes it welcome in almost any room.

The remote provides a control mechanism that can be reasonably labeled.

http://www.bose.com/controller?url=/shop_online/wave_systems/wave_radio_ii/index.jsp

$349 on Amazon

More?

Think we’re missing something? Let us know: adam@decommodify.com or @decommodify

The Unbearable Sound of Alarm Clocks

⍚ October 17, 2011
tweet

This clock has bothered me for years, but I’ve yet to replace it.

A Giant Digital Display

I bought my current clock many years ago because of the large digital readout. I wanted something I could easily read at night without my glasses.

Like most clocks, it doesn’t set itself.

This wouldn’t be so bad if setting it weren’t so terrible.

Control Problems

The snooze button is on top, which is about the only control that makes sense on the clock.

Timex controls

In order to set the time there is a switch in the back that must be moved. This switch is right next to the dimmer switch. They feel exactly the same, so can’t be distinguished by touch, so you have to turn the clock around.

But now you can’t see the time, so you have to awkwardly find the switches and buttons then have your hands behind the clock while you’re setting it to see what you’re doing, as opposed to controls on the side or top.

There are two buttons used to set the time or alarm, one for minutes and one for hours. These both only advance time, so if you go too far, or want to set an alarm or time earlier, you have to cycle all the way around again.

Which happens all the time.

One button for forward and another for reverse, or better a dial or knob, would be better.

There is a facility to record a message instead of using the buzzer to wake up. I have owned this clock for more than a decade and I have never figured out how to do it, or why I would want to.

Feedback

There is a switch on the side to cycle the alarm between off, buzzer, and “message” but the feedback as to whether the alarm is on or off is a dot to the left of the time.

Timex side view

This might be ok, except that there is another dot the left of the time to indicate PM.

To look at the clock and know if the alarm is on one has to realize: no dots means no alarm. Two dots means the alarm is on. One dot means the alarm is on, but only if it’s morning. If it’s evening, one dot means the alarm is not on.

Too much to think about.

To see what time the alarm is set for, you have to find the tiny switch in the back and switch it to set alarm, then switch it back, all without hitting any other buttons which would change the time. Common in clocks, but annoying — a second display that just shows the alarm time would solve lots of the problems.

Aesthetics

Beyond the lack of pleasing aesthetics, I really don’t need to be reminded every morning I bought a clock from Timex a decade ago.

And it’s just not a pleasing object.

Alarm!

The standard electronic alarm buzz we all know is present.

Why don’t I wake up to something more pleasant sounding?

Why is it we’ve decided the best way to wake up in the morning is with an awful noise?

You Probably Hate Your Clock Too

Complaining about products probably doesn’t do much to calm myself

While this may not have seemed constructive, it is helpful to think of these things to inform how we choose better things.

I’ll continue with analysis of potentially better clocks, an idealized design for the clock I want, and (perhaps) about trying to get it built.

If you have an alarm clock you love, or hate, or think we should look at, contact us via email or twitter.

No More Green Soap

⍚ October 14, 2011
tweet

I use Irish Spring bar soap.

Not out of some deep thought or understanding of soap, but because my father used it and why should I care?

Because, it’s soap. Right? Soap isn’t complicated.

365 Glycerin Soap, after use

But it’s on my list of objects to rationally analyze that I use daily.

A quick search finds the following: http://www.goodguide.com/products/137641-irish-spring-original-deodorant

Controversial Ingredient: Titanium Dioxide This ingredient raises a low level of health concern, according to GoodGuide’s ingredient classification. • This ingredient is suspected of causing cancer, according to sources compiled by Scorecard (www.scorecard.org) • This ingredient is suspected of causing reproductive toxicity, according to sources compiled by Scorecard (www.scorecard.org)

And what is titanium dioxide used for?

Titanium dioxide is the most widely used white pigment because of its brightness and very high refractive index (n = 2.7), in which it is surpassed only by a few other materials.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium_Dioxide

The color of my soap - which I don’t care about at all, really - may possibly be suspected of maybe giving me cancer.

But isn’t cancer a small price to pay for the comfort of a green hue I’ve known since childhood?

And I hate change.

The Science of Suds

Maybe this would all make more sense if I remembered chemistry.

Soap, after all, is simple chemistry, right? I remember learning how to make soap in chemistry class. http://cavemanchemistry.com/oldcave/projects/soap/

Let’s take a fat derived from palm oil (containing palmitic acid) and hydrolyse it using sodium hydroxide. Saponification is the term applied to the hydrolysis of fats using a strong alkali like lye. The reaction is [C15H31CO]3C3H5O3 + 3 NaOH(aq) -> 3 C15H31COONa(aq) + C3H5(OH)3(aq)

Then again, maybe it was Fight Club.

Fight Club Soap

So maybe the chemistry is a more complex than I remember, but there’s no need for a myriad of complex things I’ve never heard of to be there.

Probably.

Healthy Natural Soap

What about natural soap? Soap that isn’t trying to kill me in order to create a more pleasing pigment color or odor?

Trying to find a soap that wouldn’t kill me using GoodGuide was surprisingly infuriating.

Turns out, just about everything is full of things that are probably killing me.

Soap is simple. There shouldn’t be anything in soap that I can’t understand with advanced high school level chemistry.

I resolved to find a soap that had ingredients I could recognize.

Years Before

I mentioned my search for new soap to my girlfriend, someone who for years has been concerned about the chemical contents of products.

“I told you to stop using that stuff years ago!”

“And what did I say?”

“You told me you needed to use it because it was deodorizing and you smell.”

“That does sound like something I would say…”

Simple Soap

Tempting as it was to get some lye and start turning my garage into a soap factory, I didn’t want Tyler Durden to start messing up this product blog, so I did something much simpler.

I went to Whole Foods and picked up the simplest soap I could find.

365 Glycerin Soap package

365 Glycerin Soap FRENCH MILLED Unscented. Cruelty Free · Biodegradable, Natural, No artifical colors. Ingredients: Saponified Coconut and/or Palm Oil, Vegetable Glycerin

In Use

365 Glycerin Soap

What surprised me is, well, I actually liked it.

A lot.

After years of mass manufactured chemical infused color soaps, using a natural glycerin soap actually felt nicer. Smoother, less plastic.

Recommended.

365 Glycerin Soap, after use


365 Glycerin Soap, < $2 for a 4oz. bar. Available from Whole Foods.

The Sound of a Real Keyboard

⍚ October 12, 2011
tweet

If you’re reading this at a computer, type on the keyboard in front of you and listen.

Really listen.

What do you hear?

The Click Tap of Progress

Some clicks and taps, but probably very little in comparison to what you would have heard with a cutting edge 1980’s keyboard.

If you’re at a desk reading this, the computer in front of you has orders of magnitude more computing power than the computer that guided mankind to the moon. And the computer-phone in your pocket is more powerful than what was on your desk a decade ago. But the keyboard in front of you is likely a cheap membrane keyboard. Basically a pile of rubber plastic goop that some switches push into.

Ruber dome

A rubber dome keyboard

It wasn’t always that way.

80’s Keyboards

I’m no keyboard fanatic (the one built into my MacBook works just fine for me), but there are two legendary models from the 80s which seem to be the zenith of QWERTY design. The Apple Extended Keyboard II and the IBM Model M.

http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2008/05/a-tale-of-two-k/

If you used computers back then, you probably remember the satisfying “click.” Something is lost without that.

IBM Model M

— IBM Model M, Inside the World’s Greatest Keyboard

One could speed through typing on these — sometimes faster than the computers of the time could keep up.

Apple Extended Keyboard

The Sounds of Silence

The tactile and audio feedback of newer keyboards is significantly worse, and it may be be worse for you. The amount of force necessary to trigger a keystroke on these classic keyboards was less - you don’t have to “bottom out” the keys. With membrane keyboards, you often need more force.

But your health is a small sacrifice for the coworkers surrounding you who can click through a game of solitaire without the terrible sounds of someone trying to communicate furiously with a machine by typing quickly and loudly.


It’s a lot easier to get everyone cheaper keyboards than to give everyone an office. Or space to do their job in peace. Besides, team players want to be in the cubes, in the “pit” — to increase the frequency of interactions and communication.

We’re living in the future now, and we can’t afford to be disturbing each other with our keyboards — only by those too busy not typing on them.

Tent of tranquility

My former office.

Which Mechanically Switched Keyboard

If you have a proper office with actual walls, or choose to leave corporate life entirely to write essays for the web, it’s easier to focus on the important questions in life like:

Can anyone recommend a mechanical keyboard?

http://ask.metafilter.com/121278/Mechanical-Keyboards

…and not worry how loud and offensive your answer is.

Model M keyboard

If you want a “new” Model M get a unicomp http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net//en104bl.html

Those more serious about keyboards congregate at: http://geekhack.org/ where you can even heard sounds of the keyboards and learn all about the different kinds of switches.

Members here get mechanical keyboards for various reasons. Maybe they grew up with them and have fond memories of a IBM Model M pinging away. Maybe they got tired of throwing out mushy rubber domes every three years. The best reason is Mechanical Keyboards just feel better and they will make you more efficient at gaming/typing. After you try one most people find standard rubber dome keyboards mushy and boring! Unfortunately Mechanical Keyboards cost more than the $5 throwaway keyboard that comes with most computers and the first reaction you have may be “why bother - my keyboard works fine”. Keyboards are the primary way in which you interact with your computer. Think about how much money you spend on the other devices you use to interact with your computer - computer mice (you probably have several), computer monitor, and graphics card. Your fingers deserve the best.

http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=START+HERE+—+The+Geekhack+Mechanical+Keyboard+Guide+-+Includes+Glossary+and+Links

There’s a lot of options in mechanical keyboards, but almost all of them suffer from one terrible flaw.

The Cord

Keyboard technology did take a giant leap forward from the 1980’s in one important area: cords.

Those windy, unwieldy cords that accompany keyboards seem absurds now. An ugly mess happening constantly on your desk.

The problem is that the intersection of wireless keyboards and mechanical keyboards is nearly nonexistent.

Which makes it very easy to recommend the one I use, as there are very few options mass produced and available.

Get the XArmor U9W 2.4 GHz RF wireless mechanical keyboard

It has all the satisfying click and heft of a mechanical keyboard, but without an annoying cord.

It has a flaw: the indicators in the top right. Traditionally keyboards had num lock, caps lock, and scroll lock indicators. This one has num lock, low battery, and a transferring data indicator which lights up whenever you press a key. This feedback seems a bit excessive, and I’d rather have a caps lock indicator.

But that’s a minor issue.


Typing on it is a joy, and it is the best PC accessory I have bought in a decade.

XArmor Wireless Keyboard

★★★★ / ★★★★★

A stellar and nearly flawless product, four out of five stars.

XArmor U9W 2.4 GHz RF wireless mechanical keyboard, ~$100 on Amazon

A New Trimmer

⍚ October 2, 2011
tweet

Previously

My beard trimmer died and I started freaking out, throwing things out, making lists, and intensely focusing on the design and functionality of everything around me.

Prologue

I briefly considered going to a local store and opening up all the packaged beard trimmers and trying them, or spending hundreds of dollars in the name of science for my future hypothetical readers, but in the end I only have one beard to test on.

Since it was unlikely I would be able to actually see a selection of trimmers on display and hold them — let alone use them — I turned to the web for answers.

And as with any commercial query, I got mostly seo garbage back. But can we talk for a minute how difficult web search has become due to the bizarre economics of search and advertising on the web?

No, there’s no time, we have to move on.

ConsumerSearch recommended that other people recommended a Wahl Lithium Ion thing. So an Amazon click and a day later I was trimming my now absurdly long and unkept beard.

Review

The first thing I noted about the Wahl 9876-2001 Lithium Ion All-In-One Trimmer with Rotating Head was just how awful the packaging was.

Terrible packaging for the Wahl trimmer

After opening the terrible packaging, the second thing I noticed was that there are a lot of plastic things that come with this.

A lot of plastic things.

Lots of questionable accessories for the Wahl trimmer

The Good

The namesake lithium-ion battery comes charged, and after a week of use it’s still charged.

The unit felt powerful compared to my now useless former trimmer, and made very quick work of my increasingly terrifying and out of control beard.

Although I was annoyed at the numerous plastic guards and accessories, having a number of single length accessories is actually much better than the previous “sliding” multi-length guards I had used. With a clip on single position guard, there’s no possibility it will shift in position while shaving and you’ll end up with uneven crazy beard.

There’s a satisfying, though not overly loud, whirring sound in operation.

The Bad

All those accessories come with a plastic house for them to live in, which is supposed to look like this:

Wahl accessory hutch

Which in the real world ends up looking more like this:

Wahl accessory hutch in the real world

Terrible design: no visual cues as to what goes where, nothing fits or clicks in a satisfying manner, and who has the space for this crap in their bathroom anyway? I’m sure like everyone else who owns this, I threw it all in a dob kit bag.

The chrome looks lame and dirties easily: not the right material for a bathroom accessory.

The grip isn’t satisfying or secure, it feels slick.

Verdict

A significant improvement to my last broken shaver.

Everything fits smoothly together, and it’s powerful and functional.

Wahl Lithium Ion Trimmer

While functional, it fails to impress. Pressing it against my face seems like a chore, rather than a delight. Better materials, a more functional grip, and more delightful appearance would have been nice.

For $39.99, I now look less terrible, but I still have to shove a slightly unpleasant object into my face in the mornings.

Maybe I should just use a pair of scissors.

Wahl 9876-2001 Lithium Ion All-In-One Trimmer with Rotating Head, $39.99 on Amazon

★★ / ★★★★★

Two stars out of five.

Everyday Brokenness

⍚ October 1, 2011
tweet

Last night I tried to trim my beard but the trimmer wouldn’t work.

It appeared the battery would no longer hold a charge. But who can be sure?

My electric shaver died, and I realized, I don’t know anything about shaving technology. This is something that touches my face regularly and greatly impacts my appearance, and it doesn’t work anymore, and I know nothing.

Should I get a new beard trimmer? How would I approach such a decision? How would I know that I’m right, or wrong?

Does it even matter?

We live in a world of designed objects we only barely understand. Things I use, touch, put against my skin, consume, and rely on every day yet I have only the slightest understanding of them - let alone appreciation.

But the thing is, I remember, actually, I sort of hate my beard trimmer.

It was always broken.

Everything is Broken

Imagine a world in which everything’s broken. A world in which the spigot and the drain are on the same end of the tub, so you have to slosh water around to get it clean. A world in which the stoplights turn red at two in the morning, even though no one else is around for miles. A world in which you have to turn the CD player on, even though you should just be able to press “play.”

Now, take that world, and add in people, lots of people. Not people that fix things. People who just keep making more and more broken things, because, as far as you can tell, they like things that way. Broken. Because they don’t seem to realize it’s all broken, that none of it really works. At least, they don’t admit to it. Maybe the people are broken. Maybe they wouldn’t be so broken, if anything else actually worked. That’s the world I live in. And I’m beginning to suspect it’s your fault.

— Carl Steadman, “Just One Question for Carl Steadman” http://www.theobvious.com/archive/1997/12/24.html

When I was 17 — in high school! using the web on dialup! — I remember reading Michael Sippey’s Stating The Obvious and thinking about clocks and design and brokenness, and here I am again and it’s the same.

Carl is right. I just want things to work.

(And Carl, oh dear, Carl was right about all of it! I do have a luxury car with a GPS that requires me to set my dashboard clock by hand when it should do it for me. But I do have a watch that sets itself: my iPhone. I hope Carl got one for Christmas.)

The 80% Is Worse Than Nothing Rule

The trimmer was a Norelco [something] that had a vacuum in it that I thought would save me time, but a vacuum that only catches 80% of the hair is more infuriating than a device that catches 0% because you plan accordingly.

It was broken.

The guard had a spring that popped about a month after I bought it, so it never felt quite right to use.

The entire thing was an ugly blue plastic that never fit together cleanly.

It was broken from the start.

Why did I put such a thing on my face regularly?

I could have bought another one for less than a bag of groceries at Whole Foods. But I never did.

The King of Objects

The king of objects, the monarch among objects are not fancy objects. They’re not high-tech objects, they’re not organic objects, they’re not biological objects, they’re everyday objects. Things that you’re with every day. Whatever is in your time most, what’s taking up most of your time, or in your space most. The stuff that’s closest to your skin, on your skin, inside your skin, in intimate areas. Space and time. That’s what’s going on, that’s where it’s at. That’s where it’s happening. Common everyday objects. You need to have the best possible common everyday objects. Bruce Sterling’s reboot talk

— Bruce Sterling, Reboot 11 Speech, 2009 http://www.wired.com/beyond_the_beyond/2011/02/transcript-of-reboot-11-speech-by-bruce-sterling-25-6-2009/

Bruce Sterling gave this speech and you should read it or watch it if you haven’t, because it’s amazing, but he lays out four categories of objects:

Four variety of items: Beautiful things; emotionally important things; tools, devices and appliances that efficiently perform some useful function; and category four, everything else.

And then says we are going to have to ditch category four.

It’s not going to hurt you to lose all these things. You don’t need them. After you go through this particular discipline, you will look different, you will act differently. You will become much more what you already are.

I started to try and do this. I began in my office and started throwing things out. Things that were in my closet. Clothes that I’d never wear again.

But it did hurt, it was hard, I had to stop. I couldn’t bring myself to get rid of it all.

But will any of it matter? Will rationalizing the objects around me make me more of who I am? Is this some sort of misplaced consumer design fetishism?

1-Click

After spending 20 minutes reading unhelpful things online, I ordered a new beard trimmer from Amazon. Mostly because I couldn’t pull my car out of my garage due to construction and I don’t think they’d be “testable” at a store anyway.

But if it’s bad I’ll send it back and keep going until I find one that isn’t broken.

I’ll shave my beard off.

A plan of attack

I started a spreadsheet of every object I used during the day along with some notes.

It has a “broken” column.

There is much to fix.

It’s a first step in trying to understand the objects around me, and fixing them.

So that’s what I’ll talk about: the objects around me, my relationship to them, and how to deal with them.